One of the more interesting liberal blogs is Orange County’s own theliberaloc.com, which has a review of Michael Moore’s new movie “Psycho” — I mean “Sicko.” Not surprisingly, the theliberaloc.com finds the documentary makes a strong case for the government taking over health insurance. Moore himself, on the movie’s Web site, insists that everyone must have “free, universal health care for life,” with the insurance run by the government.
I haven’t seen “Sicko” yet and will write a full review when I do. But I want to bring up one thing: What if people don’t want medical insurance? Any national or even state “universal” scheme would be, by definition, for everyone. No exceptions. Or else.
Currently, they don’t have to get it in 49 states. The exception is Massachusetts, which under then-Gov. Mitt Romney imposed mandatory insurance last year. The bill went into effect 11 days ago. In Massachusetts the only way to breathe without having government-imposed insurance is to leave the state. Romney’s plan is probably the most likely to be imposed nationally.
This is discussed in the current issue of The American Conservative, for July 16, 2007, currently not online. In “My Body, My Choice,” James L. Payne, a retired Yale professor, says that although he’s 68, he doesn’t even use Medicare. He has saved up money precisely so that it could take care of medical emergencies. For less drastic care, his lack of insurance makes him look on it as any other purchase, figuring whether, for example, his cold is bad enough to go to the doctor.
By contrast with insurance, even with a co-pay we all know the “insurance company” will pay for most of the bill, so why not just see the doc? Payne writes:
We are not freeloaders. We believe we have a moral obligation to pay for the medical care we receive, and we always pay for it. I put no burden on doctors, hospitals, or taxpayers, and politicians are wrong to assume I am part of America’s health-care problem.
What about it, liberaloc.com? Liberalism is, or used to be, about liberty. Shouldn’t Prof. Payne have the liberty of opting out of any insurance system?
(Update: Cato has begun The Anti-Universal Coverage Club to maintain liberty of health insurance. What a great idea!)