Deprecated: Function set_magic_quotes_runtime() is deprecated in /home/johnblog/public_html/wp-settings.php on line 18
Bill of Rights « JohnSeilerBlogs.com

Archive for the ‘Bill of Rights’ Category

I confront LaRouchie trespassers

Monday, August 10th, 2009

About an hour ago I was shopping at the local Mother’s Market health food store. Outside were two protesters from Lyndon LaRouche’s faction of the Democratic Party, a man and woman, both about 25. They had a sign in front of their table with a picture of Obama with a Hitler moustache. Below the picture, the sign read:

LaRouche to Obama:
No Hitler State
Health Care Cuts

I wondered what they meant: Obama would cut health care too much? Or Obama’s socialist program wouldn’t be socialist enough for LaRouche, who has a heavy communist background, thus bringing cuts?

Trespassing

I didn’t ask them, because something more was at stake — something I bring up whenever I confront similar protesters in front of stores: property rights.

“Why are you trespassing on Mother’s property rights?” I asked.

“Are you going to join the revolution?” the man asked.

“This is private property,” I said, sticking to my point. “If you want to protest, go out there.” I pointed to the public sidewalk about 100 yards away — where, of course, there were few people walking by.

“America is falling apart,” the guy said. “Do you want to be part of that?”

You‘re part of that. Violating property rights like this is destroying America.”

“You’re referring to the Confederate Constitution,” he said. I didn’t pursue the point. But I could have said that the Confederate Constitution copied the property rights protections of the U.S. Constitution.

Instead, I said, “The Fifth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution guarantees property rights.” I didn’t quote it directly to him, but the words guarantee that a person not be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.

Instead, I pointed to a sign that Mothers had brought out and set up next to the LaRouchie table. The sign said Mother’s didn’t approve of the people there, but couldn’t remove them. I said, “Mother’s clearly doesn’t want you here, on their property. It’s only some nutty court decision that redefined private property in shopping centers as ‘public property.’ Free speech is an essential liberty, but so are property rights. How would you like it if I came into your living room and squatted there with a protest sign?”

The woman finally spoke up and tried to get me to join their revolution. I walked off.

LaRouchie run-ins

I’ve had numerous run-ins with the LaRouchies over the years. Around 1983 a friend of mine picked me up at National Airport in Washington. In ther terminal, a LaRouchie protester held a poster (this was before airport security was tightened) reading, “Support the Beam!” — a LaRouchie scheme to shoot down Soviet missiles with laser beams.

“I though Ed Koch was mayor of New York,” I quipped to my friend. He laughed because Abe Beame had been mayor of New York from 1974-77, but had been defeated in 77 by Ed Koch. (It was funny back then. Not so much now.)

In 1986 I was writing editorials for The Washington Times (an unpleasant experience itself) and wrote a signed column attacking the LaRouchies. The afternoon after the paper came out, when I came home from work my phone lines, located outside my apartment in a common box, had been cut. No other apartment denizens were affected. I called the phone company and the cops, but nothing came of it. I don’t think it was just a coincidence.

LaRouchies — Democratic leftists

LaRouche’s history is one of the stranger ones around. He’s a Democrat who has run for president seven times with his party. His ideology combines Marxism, Trotskyism, anti-Semitism, conspiracy theories about the Queen of England running the world drug trade, high-tech schemes, classical culture, and much else. The ideology changes every several years.

He has a long list of likes and hatreds. He likes Plato and hates Aristotle. Pythagoras is in but Euclid out.

He says he’s given up Marxism. But if his followers violate property rights, as I witnessed today, then he hasn’t.

Lock and load

Wednesday, August 5th, 2009

Something good happens even in a time of disaster and repression such as ours. This just in:

Gun owners are packing heat in record numbers, fearful of stricter gun control under the Obama administration and higher crime in a sour economy.

Some states and counties report a surge in applications for concealed weapons permits since the November election.

All states but Illinois and Wisconsin allow concealed weapons, but
requirements differ.

Applications already have hit a record this year in Clay County, Mo., where the sheriff’s office received 888 through June, compared with 863 in all of last year, says Sheriff Bob Boydston. The office recently hired two part-time workers to deal with the rush.

In the past, applicants tended to be middle-aged men, he says, but recent applicants include “grandmothers, older folks,
young women, young men.”

That’s all great news. Middle-aged military vets like me shouldn’t be the only ones with guns.

Naturally, people should be trained in using firearms, just as they’re trained to drive cars, another useful but sometimes misused tool. The NRA’s Eddie Eagle GunSafe program for kids is great.

And we should work to loosen conceal-carry laws even further. Everyone should be allowed to carry a gun — and ought to do so.

Vermont vs. D.C.

The ideal should be Vermont which, despite its liberal reputation, has no state gun control laws (except for record of sale). In the Green Mountain State, you can carry a gun anywhere, anytime, without even getting a permit.

And guess what? They have one of the country’s lowest crime rates. They had just 12 murders in 2007, and 8 in 2005, out of a population of 621,254 in 2007.

By contrast, Washington, D.C., despite a draconian ban on even owning a gun, and the presence of scores of police — local cops plus the headquarters for the FBI, CIA, DEA, DHS, Secret Service, etc. — had 181 murders in 2007, out of a population of 591,833. (The D.C. gun ban was overturned in 2008 by the U.S. Supreme Court in the Heller case.)

During the 1990s, murders were so high — almost 500 a year — that D.C.  swiped from Detroit the name “Murder City, U.S.A.”

So, D.C.’s murder rate was 15 times that of Vermont. The reason: In D.C. victims were disarmed, left at the mercy of criminals. By contrast, in Vermont criminals never know which robbery or rape or murder target might pull out a .44 Magnum, squint like Clint, and growl…

U.S. Gestapo “combing neighborhoods” — yours next?

Wednesday, July 1st, 2009

This just in from the Houston Chronicle:

Success on the front lines of a government blitz on gunrunners supplying Mexican drug cartels with Houston weaponry hinges on logging heavy miles and knocking on countless doors. Dozens of agents from the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives — sent here from around the country — are needed to follow what ATF acting director Kenneth Melson described as a “massive number of investigative leads.”

All told, Mexican officials in 2008 asked federal agents to trace
the origins of more than 7,500 firearms recovered at crime scenes in Mexico. Most of them were traced back to Texas, California and Arizona.

Among other things, the agents are combing neighborhoods and asking people about suspicious purchases as well as seeking explanations as to how their guns ended up used in murders, kidnappings and other crimes in Mexico.

“Combing neighborhoods” — like the Gestapo.

As if Mexico’s problems — caused by the U.S. drug war in the first
place — were any of our business. As if we could trust Mexico’s corrupt “officials” to be honest. And is if a “border” that can’t stop drugs
and people coming North could stop guns from going South.

Besides, what’s wrong with Mexicans themselves owning guns? As it
is, Mexico’s gun control laws are among the most restrictive in the
world — meaning victims are disarmed against assault from criminal and government gangs, which increasingly are the same.

The U.S. raids also perpetuate the lie that Mexico’s supposed
problem mainly stems from guns from U.S. citizens. As Fox News reported: “While 90 percent of the guns traced to the U.S. actually
originated in the United States, the percent traced to the U.S. is only
about 17 percent of the total number of guns reaching Mexico.”

This really is just more Bush-Obama tyranny, an assault on Americans’ right to keep and bear arms. Paul Craig Roberts describes this new attack on our liberties.

“Combing neighborhoods.”

What you gonna do when they come for you?

Video Part 2 Part 3…(no Part 4)…Part 5Part 6Part 7Part 8.

America after 8 years of Bush tyranny

Monday, March 30th, 2009

The following cartoon says all that needs to be said — or drawn — about the state of once-free America after 8 years of Bush tyranny:

Oh, and for all you Obama lovers out there, he’s not making things any better.

To cries of “freedom,” America in the past decade has descended into a dark cave of tyranny from which it will be difficult to leave. The government, ever incompletent, failed to protect us on 9/11, and then urned Americans’ fears into an excuse to strap a police state on us.

Bush, Cheney, the Neocons, and the others will go down in history as those who enslaved what once was the freest country ever.

Republicans continue to push tyranny

Monday, March 23rd, 2009

Achtung!

Wiped out in two general elections, Republicans still haven’t learned that Americans don’t want your stinking tyranny!

Yet there they go again. 18 Republicans in Congress, including 3 from California, are pushing to pass a new bill that would extend Soviet tyrannies they passed when they were the majority in Congress.

It’s H.R. 1467, the “Safe and Secure America Act of 2009.” A better name: The SS Amerika Akt, or Runic "SS" Amerika Akt.

It extends parts that soon would expire from the 2003 USA PATRIOT ACT, which Congress passed in a panic after the 9/11 attack, and which would be better termed the USSR TRAITORS’ Act. It repealed our sacred liberties and turned American into a tyranny.

Three of the co-sponsors are from Kalifornia:  Reps. Dan Lungren, Duncan Hunter, and Elton Gallegly.

Hunter ran a risible campaign for president last year.

Lungren is notorious as an enemy of American liberties. In the early 1980s he authored the Lungren Law, which allows the government to seize your property for any reason — even if you’re innocent — without a trial. A senile Ronald Reagan signed it. It’s a total violation of the Fourth Amendment guarantee against “unreasonable searches and seizures.” He’s still at it, getting Congress to pass a new seizure law. Herr Lungren belongs in the Reichstag in 1939, not the U.S. Congress in 2009.

So long as Republicans keep proposing, and imposing, the Runic "SS" Amerika Act and similar tyrannies, they should lose every election — and deserve to.

End all limits on political speech

Thursday, January 29th, 2009

A judge just upheld a law that Proposition 8 contributors must have their names revealed.

Like my good friend Art Pedroza, in a post of his, I used to back reporting on campaign spending . I think that’s still the position of the Orange County Register, where I wrote editorials for 19 years. (I never have supported limits on campaign spending.)

But I’ve changed my mind recently and now support ending all limits on political speech of any kind, including reporting contributions.

The First Amendment protects all speech concerning elections. So there should be no limits, no reporting requirements, no spending limits on speech concerning elections of persons or ballot measures.

If you don’t like how much money is being raised for one side, raise more money for your own side.

After all, newspapers have no limits on their speech. They even keep their editorial writers anonymous, so you don’t know who wrote their stuff. If they are privately held companies, you can’t examine their financial data.

And nowadays, anyone can start an anonymous blog, for free, and exercise unreported political speech.

All spending limits and reporting requirements have done is make the system so complex and expensive that only rich folks and professional consultants can participate.

If we got rid of all limits on campaign speech, wouldn’t special interests “buy” an election by spending a lot?

They do it anyway. Remember Schwarzenegger’s $550 million-a-year “midnight basketball” initiative in 2002, Prop. 49, in which he financed a self-promoting waste program to give himself campaign experience before his 2003 gubernatorial run? Dumb voters passed it, and it’s now adding to the deficit.

Same thing with the stem-cell initiative (from aborted children), Prop. 71 in 2004, $6 billion that now is added to the deficit. Rich biotech companies and investors funded it. Even dumber voters passed it.

The only way to give us Jose Sixpacks even a small chance agains the rich robbers is to lift all limits on free speech for elections.

Free speech is free speech. No limits.

Why Bush really may have been the worst president

Saturday, January 24th, 2009

I don’t know if Bush was America’s worst president. We’ve had so many terrible ones. If you’re old enough, remember LBJ and Nixon?

But Bush very well may have been the worst.

That’ s because what makes America unique in the annals of human history isn’t our prosperity (gone now anyway), the Super Bowl, or rock and roll. It’s the U.S. Constitution, which protects our liberties by wrapping hoops of steel around government.

Bush, more than any president since at least FDR, ripped off those hoops of steel and made a massive assault on our liberties. After him, there’s not much left of the Constitution. In the name of “protecting” us, he shredded our real protector: the Constitution.

All the vast new totalitarian powers Bush seized, last week he bequeathed to Obama.

I’ve written about this for 8 years. But a good summary comes from Christopher Manion:

Fact: Bin Laden spent half a million on 9-11, with the audacity of hope that Bush’s response would bankrupt America. It did.

Fact: 9-11 was not the most catastrophic event of the past eight years. Nor was the politically-derived collapse of our economy.

Fact: The most catastrophic event of the past eight years was the evisceration of the U.S. Constitution by a bipartisan gang of thieves and egomaniacs who show no remorse or regret for their crimes.

Fact: Bush did everything he could to destroy the fabric of comity among nations; now his spear-carriers spurn the option of their humble, honorable exit and instead fiendishly prepare to blame Obama for the consequences of Bush’s travesties.

Fact: Obama will create enough travesties of his own, thank you.

Fact: The same bipartisan peanut gallery that propounds fear of another 9-11 actually celebrates the 600,000 unnecessary deaths of the Civil War. Like Madeline Albright cheering the deaths of half a million Iraqi children **before** 9-11, these fanatics think those 600,000 deaths were “worth it.”

Fact: Our long national nightmare is not over, because the fulcrum upon which we must rely to leverage a recovery of our liberties — the Constitution — is ignored. All that is left is schoolyard taunts and mindless legacy-building.

“Curse of Plaxico Burress” defeats NY Giants in playoffs

Monday, January 12th, 2009

Yesterday the Super Bowl champion and top-ranked New York Giants lost in the playoffs to the Philadelphia Eagles. During the game, one of the TV commentators noted that New York had to stick more to a running game because they didn’t have Plaxico Burress, their star receiver, who had “self-destructed.” So, because they couldn’t pass more, they lost.

Actually, it was the Giants who “destructed” Burress.

As you may recall, Burress accidentally shot himself in a New York  night club. He is being charged with illegal possession of a gun — even though the 2nd Amendment protects the right of any American to “keep and bear arms.”

Even though his injury was minor and he could have come back to play, the Giants suspended him for the rest of the year and criticized him. They should have backed him and attacked the government of New York state and city for their oppressions. Imagine how that would have fired up the Giants!

Since then, the Giants have lost four of five games, including the playoff.

I predicted the disaster at the time, calling it “the Cure of Plaxico Burress.”

The only way the Giants can rid themselves of the Curse is to start backing Plaxico. Sign him to a long contract, attack the government, and defend him in court.

The don’t want a Big Apple version of the Motor City’s Curse of Bobby Layne, under which, this year, the Lions finished 0-16.

Selling eggs now illegal in “free” America

Sunday, December 28th, 2008

Incredible.

Just incredible.

In Ohio, formerly a free state in formerly free America, a family sold some eggs to an undercover government agent — and was assaulted by a SWAT team.

SWAT teams are American — or Amerikan — versions of the Gestapo, the Geheime Staatspolizei: “Secret State Police.”

Hey, didn’t we defeat the Gestapo and the other Nazis in World War II? I seem to remember my father, who died earlier this year at 90, a captain in the U.S. Army in World War II, mentioning a little something about how he and a couple of million other G.I.’s invaded Europe and liberated it from tyranny.

Here’s what happened in Ohio, reported WorldNetDaily.com:

A state agent from the Ohio Department of Agriculture pressured a family whose members run a food cooperative for friends and neighbors to “sell” him a dozen eggs, sparking accusations of entrapment from a lawyer defending the family.

The case brought by state and local authorities against a co-op run by John and Jacqueline Stowers in LaGrange, Ohio, came to a head on Dec. 1 when police officers used SWAT-style tactics to burst into the home, hold family members including children at gunpoint and confiscate the family’s personal food supply.

Secret police. Raids by government goons. Guns pointed at unarmed family members, including even children. Stealing food.

Is this America, or…

The Curse of Plaxico Burress

Monday, December 15th, 2008

plaxicoThere’s no such thing as real curses. But if people believe they’re real, then they can have an effect, especially in sports.

There’s the Curse of the Bambino, after the Red Sox traded Babe Ruth. It lasted from 1918 until 2004, when the Sox finally won the World Series again. (My conjecture is that the “curse” was “cancelled” when the Sox hired Bill James, the best baseball statistics guy, and people figured the team finally knew what it was doing.)

Then there’s the Curse of the Billy Goat against the Chicago Cubs, who haven’t won the World Series since 1908.

In pro football, there’s the Curse of Bobby Layne against the Detroit Lions. The legendary quarterback won three championships for the Lions in the 1950s, the last in 1958. When they traded him to the Pittsburgh Steelers, he said the Lions “would not win for 50 years.” Since then, they’ve won only a single playoff game, no championships. This year the Lions soon may be the first team to go 0-16.

Plaxico and the 2nd Amendment

Two weeks ago N.Y. Giants star receiver Plaxico Burress accidentally shot himself in the leg in a New York night club. The city’s evil government is charging him with the “crime” of illegal possession of a firearm. N.Y. City’s fascist Mayor Bloomberg insisted, according to Wikipedia:

that Burress be prosecuted to the fullest extent, saying that any punishment short of the minimum 3½ years for unlawful carrying of a handgun would be “a mockery of the law.”

The real mockery is Bloomberg himself, an elitist, insulated billionaire who has police guards protecting him; he also is so rich he can hire armed guards. He has no idea what life is really like in the city he misrules.

Giants now cursed

But worst of all was that the Giants’ management, which until now has been the class act of the NFL, suspended Burress without pay. Since then they’ve lost two games. Today they were pasted, 20-8, by Dallas, and couldn’t even score a touchdown. They no longer can be considered the league’s top team. Last February, they won the Super Bowl. Will the “Curse of Plaxico Burress”  prevent them from winning for 50 years?

What they should have done was keep him on the roster, even while awaiting his wound to heal. And they should have made an announcement something like:

We regret that our great player, Plaxico Burress, was injured. But it was an accident; no one else was hurt. We also will back him up 100% in the unjust prosecution of him for exercising his Second Amendment right to “keep and bear arms” to defend himself and his family. Mayor Bloomberg’s fascist outburst is to be deplored.

We also are bringing a $10 billion lawsuit against the mayor, the city of New York, and the state of New York for assaulting Mr.  Burress’ constitutional rights. This is America, not 1930s Nazi Germany, where Hitler’s 1938 gun-control law was a prelude to the worst barbarisms. Have we learned nothing from history?

We also would like to point to the research of gun scholar John Lott, who wrote:

While the massive size and strength of NFL players might make them seem like unlikely potential crime victims, their wealth and high public profile nonetheless make them particularly attractive targets for violent criminals. While “only” two players were murdered last year, that means a murder rate of 118 per 100,000 people, compared to 5.9 per 100,000 for the rest of the population. In other words, the rate for NFL players was 20 times higher than the average for the rest of the country. This is even higher than the most at risk segment of the population -– young black males between 18 and 24. It is even higher than the risk faced by police officers.

Last year, the Washington Redskins’ Sean Taylor was killed during a robbery at his house. The Denver Broncos’ defensive back Darrent Williams was killed outside a nightclub.

As Tampa Bay Buccaneers cornerback Ronde Barber noted, “We are targets, we need to be aware of that everywhere we go.” Yet, the news coverage doesn’t engender much sympathy for Plaxico Burress.

So, what do many NFL players do when they realize that their physical strength does not give them enough protection from violent crime? The same thing that many other would-be victims do — they get guns. Well over 50 percent of NFL players are estimated to own guns, somewhat higher than the 45 percent of American adults who own guns.

I rooted for the underdog Giants in the last Super Bowl. No more.

Now they’re going to suffer the Curse of Plaxico Burress.