Deprecated: Function set_magic_quotes_runtime() is deprecated in /home/johnblog/public_html/wp-settings.php on line 18
Socialism « JohnSeilerBlogs.com

Archive for the ‘Socialism’ Category

Moon Shot helped blow out the U.S. economy

Saturday, July 18th, 2009

When I was a kid growing up in the 60s, I was enthralled by the Space Program, especially the Moon Shot, whose 40th anniversary is being celebrated. I read numerous books on space exploration, watched all the launches on TV, and even once cut Saturday catechism class to watch a Gemini launch.

But a lot has happened since then, including the ongoing bankruptcy of America. A few thoughts:

Regime uncertainty

Robert Higgs has come up with a useful concept: “regime uncertainty.” Is the government a) helping businesses grow and create jobs by keeping the currency stable and reducing taxes and regulations; then the regime is certain and stable.

Or is the government b) hammering businesses with inflation and wild new spending coupled with new taxes and regulations. Then there is “regime uncertainty. Nobody knows what’s going to happen next, so economic planning and investment are difficult, sometimes impossible.

LBJ’s wild spending

So let’s look at the last 45 years:

After LBJ’s 1964 landslide, he and the Democratic Congress did b), greatly increasing “regime uncertainty.” They went on a spending binge on his Great Society socialist schemes. The cost of them, over the years, has been immense — tens of trillions of dollars.

In 1965, he escalated the Vietnam War, eventually putting 550,000 troops in Nam. The total cost of the war (1965-1973) was $100 billion then, about $3 trillion today factoring inflation and population growth — about the same cost of the Iraq War (so far).

And he (and JFK and Nixon) wasted $10 billion on the Moon Shot, about $300 billion in today’s money.

With the federal budget buckling, in 1968 LBJ pushed through a 10% income tax surtax that brought on a recession. He and the Fed also began inflating the currency — the usual government tactic of cheating people by paying them with money actually worth less than what’s written on the bills.

Nixon’s the One!

The recession, Nam, Great Society welfarism, riots, and the whole mess of 1968 brought us Nixon. If he had had any sense, he would have demanded that Congress make the Vietnam War legit by declaring war; Congress would not have done so, so he could have ended it posthaste, saving about half the final cost in lives (58,000 Americans dead, 3.2 million Viets dead) and treasure. He didn’t. He should have fought LBJ’s Great Society. He didn’t, instead funding and expanding it (for example, with affirmative action).

And Nixon should have ended the inflation by returning to a rock-solid gold standard at $35 an ounce. Instead, in 1971 as part of his New Economic Policy (same name as Lenin’s), he took us off gold for the first time under the Constitution (except for Lincoln’s greenbacks), sparking the inflation that has plagued us ever since. He also increased taxes and tariffs.

The cost of the spending binge

So, add up the LBJ-Nixon spending binge, in today’s adjusted dollars: $3 trillion for Nam, $300 billion for the Moon Shot, tens of trillions for the Great Society.

Although the Moon Shot wasn’t the main part of the spending binge, it was a large part of it.

In addition in 1972 Congress indexed Socialist Security to the inflation rate, with Nixon’s backing. Except the index was to the cost-of-living rate, NOT to wages — a completely idiotic thing to do. The result is that at times like these in 2009, when jobs are dying and pay is stagnant, oldsters still get a cost-of-living increase in Socialist Security — 5.8% for this year.

Did you get a raise of that much? I didn’t think so. Yet you’re forced to pay for the SS increase.

1970s-2000s

The 1970s were the Malaise. In the 1980s, Reagan stabilized the dollar, cut taxes and regulations for a few years and sparked growth. Bush I was a disaster.

In the 1990s, Clinton was a disaster for his first 2 years in office, then for his next 6 years, ever slick, actually cut taxes and was not too bad on spending.

In the 2000s, Bush II panicked after 9/11, inflated the currency, spent wildly on war and domestic waste, and enacted tax cuts that will expire next year. Now we have Obama, who is continuing Bush’s disastrous policies so much he should be adopted by the Bush family and dubbed Bush III.

No wonder the system is going bankrupt.

It’s even worse now

As bad as the 70s were, it’s even worse now — because now our manufacturing base is greatly eroded and the country is much less Christian. The whole superstructure of war, deficits, debt, inflation, and wild spending is collapsing like a cheap card table. There shall be wailing and gnashing of teeth.

Marxism-Leninism-Bushism: Bush again admits he’s a socialist

Monday, January 12th, 2009

bushWith just 8 more days left in his anti-American administration, Bush again admitted he favors government control of the economy — socialism:

I readily concede I chucked aside my free-market principles when I was told … the situation we were facing could be worse than the Great Depression. [But] we’ve taken extraordinary measures to deal with frozen credit markets [that] have helped thaw the credit market.

Tongue-tied to the end.

Actually, it’s his previous socialist policies — a $5 trillion bad war in Iraq, paid for with deficits, debt, and inflation — that caused a bad recession. And his “extraordinary measures” are turning a bad recession into the Bush Depression.

Bmarx leninush has become the biggest socialist in history — much bigger than Marx, Lenin, or Mao. Lenin and Mao, in power, socialized relatively small economies compared to the gigantic capitalist American economy Bush has socialized.

Socialists throughout the world, especially on American university campuses, should put him up there in the socialist pantheon with Marx and Lenin.

It’s Marxism-Leninism-Bushism.

They’re all socialists

Sunday, October 19th, 2008

It’s amusing to hear McCain say Obama is a socialist. Of course Obama is.

So is McCain.

McCain and Obama supported Bush’s $700,000,000,000.00 socialist bailout of Wall Street.

McCain supported Bush’s socialist No Child Left Behind takeover of American schools.

McCain supported Bush’s $40,000,000,000.00 yearly new socialist drug program for retirees, further socializing American medicine.

Among other Republicans, Romney imposed a mandatory socialized medicine on the people of Massachusetts when he was governor.

Huckabee imposed many new socilialist programs and taxes on the people of Arkansas.

And so on.

Only one candidate of either major party is not a socialist: Ron Paul. He also warned for years that socialist schemes would bring about the economic collapse we’re now going through.

Of the third-party candidates, two are socialists: Cynthia McKinney of the Green Party and Ralph Nader.

Two are not socialists: Chuck Baldwin of the Constitution Party and Bob Barr of the Libertarian Party.

That’s the choice this year, if it is a choice.

Marxism-Leninism-Bushism

Friday, October 17th, 2008

I never voted for Bush, in 2000 favoring Buchanan. But I remember in 2000 going with some friends to the Republican Party’s big election-night bash at a hotel here in Orange County. I was sort of hoping — sort of, maybe, after I’d packed away a few shots of Dewar’s to ease the pain — that Gore, who was bad enough, would lose, that the Clinton regime would be over, and that Bush at least might restore some capitalism.

We all have our delusions.

As I said, I didn’t vote for him.

bushNow Bush has become the biggest socialist in American history. Venezuelan boss Hugo Chavez taunted Bush, as reported by Reuters:

Socialist Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez mocked George W. Bush as a “comrade” on Wednesday, saying the U.S. president was a hard-line leftist for his government’s intervention of major private banks in the U.S. financial crisis.

Chavez, who calls capitalism an evil and ex-Cuban leader Fidel Castro his mentor, ridiculed Bush for his plan for the federal government to take equity in American banks despite the U.S. right-wing’s criticism of Venezuelan nationalizations.

“Bush is to the left of me now,” Chavez told an audience of international intellectuals debating the benefits of socialism. “Comrade Bush announced he will buy shares in private banks.”

Indeed, it’s true that Comrade Bush is not only a socialist, but a communist, hence my headline for the new ideology: Marxism-Leninism-Bushism.

marxIn his “Communist Manifesto,” Marx wrote up a 10-point plank of communist action, the most important of which was:

5. Centralization of credit in the hands of the State, by means of a national bank with State capital and an exclusive monopoly.

That’s what Comrade Bush just did with his $700,000,000,000.00 bailout of Wall Street, so he’s a Marxist.

leninAnd here’s Lenin, from “The Proletariat and the Party on the Road to October,” meaning the Bolshevik revolution in October 1917  (from “Selected Works” [New York: International Publishers, 1960, Vol. VI, p. 142]; emphasis in original):

We did not propose nor could anybody have proposed, anything  but the immediate establishment of control over the trusts, the banks, trade, the parasites, and over foodstuffs.

So, Comrade Bush is a Leninist, too.

Hence, Marxism-Leninism-Bushism.

Curiously, Comrade Bush’s communist revolution took place in the same month as Lenin’s: October.

Dumping Socialist Security: Andy Favor’s great idea

Thursday, July 24th, 2008

big 3In 1935, President-for-Life Franklin “Dictator” Roosevelt was looking for ideas from Mussolini’s fascist Italy, Hitler’s Nazi Germany, and Stalin’s communist Soviet Union. The really bad idea he imposed on formerly free America that year was Socialist Security. It immediately made the Great Depression the Great-Great Depression.

Today the Socialist Security tax is an immense burden on workers, especially young people. Combined with another Fascist-Nazi-Soviet scheme, Medicare — which was imposed by another tyrant, LBJ — the tax is 15.3% of income. That includes the “employer” portion, really paid by the worker.

Both Socialist Security and Medicare are going broke. No wonder a poll a couple of years ago found that more young people believe in UFO’s than believe they’ll get an FDR dime’s worth of their money back from Socialist Security. Hey, E.T., Chewbacca, and Mr. Spock never stole 15.3% of people’s incomes.

And really, why should we Americas, today, be stuck with a Socialist Security scheme imposed back in 1935 — 73 years ago during the age of fascism, Nazism, and communism? That makes as much as importing Lenin’s mummified corpse and running it for president in November.

Republicans have come up with various schemes to “privatize” Socialist Security. None of them would work. Allowing people do divert some SS “contributions” to stocks only would put the federal fascists in charge of the stock equities market. Except for Ron Paul — who’s really a libertarian — the only “new” ideas Republicans have lately are for more unconstitutional, dumb wars, and for shredding the Bill of Rights so they can detain, torture, and “disappear” anybody they don’t like, including American citizens.

Andy’s idea

andy favorA new idea is being put forward by Andy Favor, a Libertarian Party (what else?) candidate for the California Assembly. His idea, as reported on Orange Punch:

73rd State Assembly Candidate Andy Favor is making a 10th Amendment argument to permit residents to opt out of the Federal Social[ist] Security system. Apparently others across the nation share the same view. The Oklahoma House of Representatives have passed a resolution reclaiming their sovereignty under the 10th amendment.

The 10th Amendment states:

The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.

So a state legislature could pass a law stating that a right “reserved to the States respectively” is the right of the state’s people to opt-out of Socialist Security.

Some politicians in Oklahoma are beginning to re-assert their independence from the fascist Federal government. Reports Family Security Matters:

The Oklahoma House of Representatives passed House Joint Resolution (1089) reclaiming their sovereignty.

Right on!

Meanwhile, the federal government just keeps getting worse. It’s inflating the dollar. It’s fighting more and more wars that have nothing to do with “defending” Americans. It despises and destroys our liberties. It taxes us to death and, after that, runs up more than $9 trillion in debt on our credit card — without our approval.

That’s more than $9,000,000,000,000.00 in debt.

It’s time to start fighting back.

Naturaly, I’m supporting Andy Favor’s idea, and his candidacy. If you can, send him a few bucks (mail-in only) in his bid for the state Assembly.

Stalin: The Red Tsar

Tuesday, March 11th, 2008

I just finished one of the most horrifying books I’ve ever read: “Stalin: The Court of the Red Tsar,” by Simon Sebag-Montefiore. It’s exhausting and exhaustive. I highly recommend that you read it — although you might wait until October. Not to commemorate the murderous October Boskhevik Revolution in Russia, but because it’s the month of Halloween.

In recent years many Soviet records have been opened, as well as Stalin’s papers. So we now have the details of what was obvious to many even when he was alive: He was a monster rivaled only by Hitler and Mao.

After a brief look at Stalin’s early career (covered in the author’s more recent book, “Young Stalin“), we’re plunged into his power struggles in the late 1920s. Basically, he followed in the footsteps of Lenin: he killed, and killed again — and again, and again, and again. Every year sees new “enemies” of socialism that he must exerminate: Kulaks (”rich” peasants who owned a couple of cows), Trotskyites, industrial “wreckers,” the Old Bolsheviks (who had started the revolution with him, Lenin, and Trotsky), Volga Germans, Chechens, Mingrelians, finally Jews in the “Doctors’ Plot” just before he died.

The author avoids the usual details about the ideological differences among Stalin, Trotsky, and others. Who cares any longer about such socialist theoretical piffle — besides Marxist American university professors? Stalin’s evil is highlighted by showing that he was not an alien from another planet, but a real human being. He was highly intelligent, loved his children, was devastated when his wife killed herself (beginning another purge after it), had perfect pitch and a beautiful singing voice, was a decent poet as a young man, and read voraciously.

Famines and purges

In the late 1920s, he sent his top henchmen — Molotov, Kaganovich, Mikoyan, and Voroshilov — out to starve or imprison peasants who wouldn’t give their grain to the government, or who killed their few cows rather than have them stolen for socialism. He sent the henchmen out again to perpetrate the Ukrainian famine of the early 1930s, when from 5-7 million were starved to death. Whole towns were wiped out.

In the infamous show trials of the late 1930s, he purged most of the Communist Party leaders. His top secret police bosses, also major torturers, in turn became victims: Yegoda was killed by Yezhov who was killed by Beria who was killed, after Stalin’s death, by his rival Politburo members.

Meanwhile, Stalin and the other magnates took trains from Moscow to their lavish vacation homes in Georgia (Stalin’s place of origin) or the Crimea, passing along the way through towns devastated by famine. Sometimes those on the trains would lift the curtains and see the human devastation.

stalinNobody was safe from being shot or sent to the Gulag: old friends, relatives, eminent scientists, all were at risk. Almost every day he and his henchmen sat around deciding who would die, then composing lists which had hundreds or even thousands of names on them. All the killers signed their names.

Religion was severely persecuted, especially the Russian Orthodox Church. Uniate Catholic bishops were secretly assassinated. The arts were taken over under the phrase Stalin coined, “engineers of the human soul.”

He had one of the sickest senses of humor ever. When he kills the wife of an assistant, he quips, “Don’t worry. We’ll get you another wife.”

Yet though he killed or imprisoned the wives of many colleagues and relatives, they cringingly went along with the crimes — before, in many cases, falling victim themselves.

Socialism = death

I don’t know what the author’s politics are, but he makes clear that most of the killing resulted from socialism. Socialist industry wasn’t growing fast enough, so Stalin forcibly collectivized farms to get money for industrialization. When industrialization still didn’t go fast enough, he shot hundreds of thousands of managers and engineers. He didn’t like it that there were seasonal variations in production in Leningrad, something that happens in every industry, so he ordered the production evened out — an impossibility. The Leningrad boss forged the paperwork, which was found out by his rivals. They told Stalin, who had the boss shot.

What’s clear is this: The more socialism, the more death. Total socialism means Stalinism. Lesser amounts of socialism — such as with Canada’s deadly health-care system — mean fewer deaths, but deaths nonetheless. “Democratic” socialism means rule by bureaucrats as much as Stalinist socialism. Given that America’s tax level is about 50%, we’re about 50% socialist — or 50% Stalinist. Socialism = death.

stalinBiographers often joke that, by the end of their books, they’re sick of their subjects. Montiefore had good reason to get sick of Stalin way before the end, as he lines up horrific detail after horrific detail. But he persevers almost to the end. Then even his loathing of Stalin comes through. As in a horror movie, the reader just is chanting, “Die! Die! Die!”

At the end, Stalin begins his attack on the Jews, the phony “Doctors’ Plot,” that would have been another Holocaust. Although bigoted against Jews, he’s not a racial anti-Semite, like Hitler. Indeed, one of his top henchmen, Kaganovich, was Jewish. But after World War II Stalin distrusts Jews because they had an identity other than worshiping him and the Soviet Union.

He also starts going after his top henchmen and their wives. Molotov’s wife, Polina, was Jewish and had a brother who was a businessman in America. She was sent to the Lubyanka prison. (Although innocent of treason, she backed Stalin and helped hubby Molotov during his 1930s trips to starve out the peasants.)

Sebag-Montefrroe concludes that Stalin’s fatal stroke in March 1953 probably would have killed him no matter what. But his bodyguards, instead of calling in doctors, call in his top henchmen, Beria, Malenkov, Khrushchev, and Bulganin, who soon are joined by the out-of-favor Molotov and Mikoyan. The henchmen wait many hours before calling the doctors.

The doctors called are incompetent because the best doctors are in the Gulag. Any remote chance of saving Stalin is lost. He dies.

The “Doctors’ Plot” purge is canceled. Molotov’s wife, Polina, is released. But even until their natural deaths years later, Molotov and Polina remained unrepentant Stalinists.

“Uncle Joe”

Stalin remains popular among some people in Russia because he supposedly was a “strong man,” vozhd in Russian, who made the USSR a global empire. Actually, he almost killed Russia, which today is thriving only because it’s doing the opposite of his nutty socialism by adopting capitalism.

stalin roosevelt churchillAlso amazing is that Stalin was worshiped in America as “Uncle Joe,” our cuddly “democratic” ally in World War II. Over the years I even have argued with some left-wing Americans who thought Stalin’s mass starvation and purges were “necessary” to build the industrial base that beat Hitler in World War II.

Except that Hitler won a lot of votes in 1932 because Germans and many others in Europe were deathly afraid of communism; Stalin’s killing of about 10% of the Soviet people before the war took away a lot of soldiers; Stalin’s purges of the Red Army just before the war took away its best leadership; his purges of top engineers took away a lot of weapons-design talent; and his own idiocy in not heeding multiple warnings of Hitler’s invasion let the Nazis get the jump on him.

Hitler, Stalin, Mao — it’s hard to say who was worse.

May humankind never see their likes again.

Federal Govt. $53 trillion in debt on socialism promises

Thursday, December 20th, 2007

Socialism always goes bankrupt. Look at what happened to the old Soviet Union.

It won’t be long before another socialist entity, the U.S. government, goes belly up. According to a new report by the U.S. government itself, as described by AP:

The government is promising $45 trillion more than it can deliver on Social Security, Medicare and other benefit programs….

That’s $45,000,000,000,000.00

The $45.1 trillion shortfall has increased by nearly $1 trillion in just one year, according to the administration’s “Financial Report of the United States Government” for 2006. And, it’s up 67.8 percent in just the past four years. In 2003, the shortfall between promised benefits and revenue sources over a 75-year period was put at $26.9 trillion.

The shortfall includes Socialist Security and Medicare in addition to Railroad Retirement and the Black Lung program.

When the gap in funding social insurance programs is added to other government commitments, the total shortfall as of Sept. 30 represented $53 trillion, up more than $2 trillion in just a year, the report said.

That’s $53,000,000,000,000.00.

Your children and grandchildren will be paying that — unless the government goes bankrupt, which it will. Why should your children and grandchildren pay for government workers who aren’t even shirking anymore, but retired?

Keep up with my blog. Sign up for my RSS feed. And click here to hire me for your writing projects.)