How to reform the Supreme Court?

July 2nd, 2009

In the wake of the Ricci decision, Steve Sailer wonders how to reform the U.S. Supreme Court, such as by term limits:

Some of what’s wrong with the Supreme Court is structural. Justices used to drop dead of heart attacks before they aged too far into mental decline. By this point, lots of people have heard about the best solution: replace lifetime tenure with single 18 year terms, with the President getting to select two justices for each election he wins.

What nobody knows, as far as I know, is how to get there from here.

My comment on his blog:

I remember during the Reagan years, conservatives like me tried to get term limits on justices. It went nowhere. Change is probably impossible. So I might as well advance my utopian solution:

The U.S. Supreme Court is made up of the 50 state chief justices, who meet once a year in Aspen, Colorado, where they have one month to ski, drink, and decide all cases they think important. What they don’t decide, or what is decided by a tie, is left to the lower courts, or (gasp!) “reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.”

Paul and Paul in 2012

July 2nd, 2009

Let me be the first to say it: Paul and Paul in 2012.

That is: Ron Paul and Rand Paul in 2012. Or: Paul and Paul in 12. Or: Ron Paul and Rand Paul in 12.

Ron Paul should run for president again — and his son Rand should run for vice president!

Rand PaulHere’s the formula:

Ron Paul + Rand Paul = Victory

For short:

Paul + Paul = Victory

It would be the greatest ticket in American history, and give Republicans their only chance to beat President Vladimir Ilich Obamov.

Ron Paul you know about. The Texas congressman was the only Republican or Democratic candidate in the 2008 election who supported restoring the U.S. Constitution, liberty, and economic common sense, such as abolishing the inflationary demon known as the Federal Reserve Board.

He warned, for years, that war, Federal Reserve inflation, and massive deficits and debt would ruin America, and the Bush Depression of the past 2 years has proved him right.

Meet Rand Paul

Randall Paul — Rand for short — is Ron’s son, and a chip of the old Ron. Rand, like his pop, is a medical doctor, meaning he has competency and experience in a field outside politics — unlike about 99% of politicians. And he holds his father’s views on the Constitution, the wars, the economy, etc.

Now, for 2010 Rand is running for U.S. Senate from Kentucky. Here are some short videos of his positions. And unlike almost every politician ever heard of, he actually believes his positions, and would do his best, in office, to implement them.

Naturally, Rand is being opposed by Kentucky’s corrupt Republican establishment, which is running a Clinton Democrat against Rand in the GOP primary!

As in 2008, rather than have a Paul come to office and start restoring the Constitution and decency to government, they’d rather have a Democrat win and maintain the corrupt existing system.

Here’s Rand Paul’s Web site. If you can, click here and send him a few campaign bucks. He’ll need them against the filthy money the Republican establishment is throwing against him in the primary — which really is your tax money flushed through the sewers of  Wall Street firms and other corrupt entities as “bailouts,” then sent out to pollute our democracy.

1776 — That’s the Spirit!

However Rand does in his Senate bid in 2010, he should be on the national ballot with his father in 2012.

Paul and Paul in 2012 –  it’s a ticket made in the Spirit of 1776.

U.S. Gestapo “combing neighborhoods” — yours next?

July 1st, 2009

This just in from the Houston Chronicle:

Success on the front lines of a government blitz on gunrunners supplying Mexican drug cartels with Houston weaponry hinges on logging heavy miles and knocking on countless doors. Dozens of agents from the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives — sent here from around the country — are needed to follow what ATF acting director Kenneth Melson described as a “massive number of investigative leads.”

All told, Mexican officials in 2008 asked federal agents to trace
the origins of more than 7,500 firearms recovered at crime scenes in Mexico. Most of them were traced back to Texas, California and Arizona.

Among other things, the agents are combing neighborhoods and asking people about suspicious purchases as well as seeking explanations as to how their guns ended up used in murders, kidnappings and other crimes in Mexico.

“Combing neighborhoods” — like the Gestapo.

As if Mexico’s problems — caused by the U.S. drug war in the first
place — were any of our business. As if we could trust Mexico’s corrupt “officials” to be honest. And is if a “border” that can’t stop drugs
and people coming North could stop guns from going South.

Besides, what’s wrong with Mexicans themselves owning guns? As it
is, Mexico’s gun control laws are among the most restrictive in the
world — meaning victims are disarmed against assault from criminal and government gangs, which increasingly are the same.

The U.S. raids also perpetuate the lie that Mexico’s supposed
problem mainly stems from guns from U.S. citizens. As Fox News reported: “While 90 percent of the guns traced to the U.S. actually
originated in the United States, the percent traced to the U.S. is only
about 17 percent of the total number of guns reaching Mexico.”

This really is just more Bush-Obama tyranny, an assault on Americans’ right to keep and bear arms. Paul Craig Roberts describes this new attack on our liberties.

“Combing neighborhoods.”

What you gonna do when they come for you?

Video Part 2 Part 3…(no Part 4)…Part 5Part 6Part 7Part 8.

My views on Darwin and evolution

June 30th, 2009

Pat Buchanan has a new column up on evolution, “Making a Monkey Out of Darwin.”

My response:

Pat here in a short column ties together several things that need to be untied. First, as Pat admits, “Yet a theory can produce evil–and still be true.” And Darwinism, or at least a modest application of micro-evolution (change at or below the species level), has produced many medical breakthroughs in understanding how humans and other organisms function, and will do so even more in the future. One need only look at research into lactose intolerance (most Northern Europeans don’t have it) and malaria (most Africans and some Italians developed a resistance to it, but also a tendency to sickle-cell anemia).

Even most Fundamentalist Christians who oppose macro-evolution (at or above the level of species) accept micro-evolution.

Second, as to macro-evolution, this theory is much more complex, and I must admit that I seem to be one of the few agnostics on the matter. It is, after all, a *theory*. Maybe if the government wouldn’t tax me so much I might be able to conduct a thorough investigation.

There’s also a problem with macro-evolution advocates: As Pat said, they all, it seems (or at least the major ones we hear about), look on it as a substitute religion, instead of just a scientific theory. Richard Dawkins (an atheists who keeps his Christian first name) calls anyone who opposes him an idiot, and insists that parents who don’t accept evolution have their children taken away. Christopher Hitchens (an atheist who keep’s his Christian first name) says the same thing; although Hitchens himself isn’t a scientist, many books on evolution cite him on the blurbs on their back covers (for example, “Why Evolution Is True,” by Jerry A. Coyne).

If evolutionists were more modest and took time to explain things to the lesser breeds without the law of evolution, they might get further.

Third, as to public policy, the real reason the elites in America and Europe promote evolution is to brainwash children against their parents’ faiths — in public schools, many private and parochial schools, colleges, and universities.

Yet Christian Fundamentalists avoided the Darwinian political crimes of the Nazis and Communists that Pat notes. (Although, in practice, Stalin and his biological henchman Lysenko were Lamarckians.)

At a purely scientific level, the Fundamentalists also avoided the theory of the “multiregional” origins of humans, meaning the races evolved in different areas, which was widely believed as recently as 50 years ago by such folks as respected Harvard anthropologist Carleton S. Coon. Modern genetics proves, instead, the “out of Africa” theory, that all humans have a common ancestor.

The Fundamentalists believed that all humans were offspring of Adam, and so all deserving of respect as children of God. So whatever the Fundies believed about science, they were right about the most important thing: that there are just men, not sub-humans and uebermenschen. (Unfortunately, nowadays the Fundies are obsessed with America invading the Middle East to incite God to Armageddon, thus getting them raptured from their cars.)

Finally, the real battle for those of us on the Right is not to bring “creationism” into the public schools, but to abolish the public schools and to end or reduce tax funding of all colleges and universities, which nowadays are anti-intellectual citadels of intolerance.

If Darwinians really believe their theories are superior, they should be the first to reject the crutch of coerced tax subsidies.

Privatization of all education would mean educational Darwinism: competing theories battling it out in the classroom, with parents, with students, and in the marketplace of ideas. Let the fittest theories survive.

President Vladimir Ilich Obamov

June 28th, 2009

Lenin

The proper name for our young president is: Vladimir Ilich Obamov.

Just like his predecessor, Georgi Ilich Bushnev, he’s been imposing the socialist policies of Vladimir Ilich Ulyanov’s 1920s “New Economic Policy” (NEP). Ulyanov called himself Lenin (”iron” in Russian).

When Leonid Ilich Brezhnev was Soviet boss in the 1960s and 1970s, old party hacks who worked in the Soviet regime from Lenin to Brezhnev said they had gone “From Ilich to Ilich.”

The same thing can be said for some in the government today. War Secretary Robert Gates also has served “from Ilich to Ilich” — that is, from Georgi Ilich Bushnev to Vladimir Ilich Obamov.

The Soviet policies of Bushnev and Obamov are just like those of Lenin’s NEP: government takeover of industry, such as of GM and Chrysler; government takeover of banking; government takeover of medicine; wild deficit spending; inflation; repression of free speech; continuous wars of “liberation”; tyranny.

More blogging by me?

June 2nd, 2009

I might start doing a little blogging. Like most of you, I’m struggling in the Bush Depression. It’s hard to find time to write.

If you’ve read my blogs or other writings over the years, you’ll recall that I warned for years that perpetual war, inflation, and socialism would lead to economic ruin. And it’s going to last a long, long time.

The government, which caused the Bush Depression, is just making things worse under Obama.

State Sovereignty movements sweeping USA — California next?

April 2nd, 2009

President Bush’s tyrannies sparked State Soverignty movements that only are increasing under the further oppressions of President Obama.

28 states now have introduced legislation asserting state sovereignty “partly in response to the conditions” under the Bush-Obama “stimulus” bills that vastly increased the tyranny of the central regime in Washington, according to The Christian Science Monitor. Four of the resolutions have passed, in Idaho, South Dakota, Oklahoma, and South Carolina. Two have been rejected, in New Hampshire and Arkansas. 22 are still pending.

This isn’t just a bunch of Southerners still sore about losing the Civil War. Most of the states are in the North and West. Here’s a map:

Americans are starting to remember that our country was born in revolt against the British tyranny of 1776. Today, the Washington, D.C. tyranny is much greater than King George III ever could have imagined.

Taxes now are half of our incomes, and going higher. Mutitudinous federal security agencies — NSA, FBI, CIA, DHS, etc. — spy, coerce, and jail us. Massive bureaucracies control every minute portion of our lives. And now, the feds have taken over the banking, insurance, and auto industries. America rsembles less the free country of 1789 than the Soviet Union of 1939.

So far, there isn’t such a movement in California’s Legislature. But someone ought to start one.

As Karen De Coster writes:

There is a secession movement afoot and its proponents are determined to put a halt to the federal government’s ambitions to destroy and reconstruct an entire economy and dissolve the last remnants of individual liberty….

The speed with which the federal government intends to take over private institutions and usurp states’ rights and individual autonomy is unprecedented. When the Bush-Obama regime maneuvers are compared to the Hoover-FDR New Deal era, it looks like today’s hare vs. yesterday’s turtle. The state’s various propaganda arms, from big media to institutionalized special interest forces, are being empowered to publicize and sell the agenda of the totalitarian state by painting it in glossy colors that warm the hearts of unresisting Americans.

There are, however, growing pockets of dissenters who conclude that life, liberty, property, and the futures of their children are more important than the trivial things that occupy the minds of the submissive class. For that reason, the state’s militarized police force, which has been given unparalleled powers by the contrived crises following 9-11, has snowballed in size and is being fortified in expectation of confronting rebellion from those citizens who intend to resist the tyranny of an over-reaching Leviathan.

Since the Bush II regime took control and 9/11 became its launch pad for sweeping hegemony, the police state has moved more swiftly than ever to demonize resistance and criminalize dissent. The most recent example is the Missouri Information Analysis Center (MIAC) report that profiled individuals according to their political convictions, especially those ideas that agitate against the institutionalization of unconstitutional acts that are intended to grow state power at the expense of individual liberties. Ron Paul, Chuck Baldwin, Bob Barr (!), guns & ammo, taxes, the Federal Reserve, secession, and resistance to universal government service or anti-privacy actions – all of those topics have become keywords in the crusade to criminalize individuals who refuse to be rounded up like cattle and marched toward serfdom.

Real patriots

As to me, my political views haven’t change much over my 53 years, always favoring limited government and opposing tyranny. Yet I’ve gone from being a patriot to, under Bush-Obama, someone considered a threat to the government Establishment!

Well, I’m still a patriot — a real patriot. It’s Bush and Obama who are the real traitors to America’s sacred legacy of liberty and limited government.

May the State Sovereignty movement continue to grow until it tames, or if necessary abolishes, the central tyranny. As a famous document once put it:

When, in the course of human events, it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bonds which have connected them with another, and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the laws of nature and of nature’s God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation.

We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable rights, that among these are life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. That to secure these rights, governments are instituted among men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed. That whenever any form of government becomes destructive to these ends, it is the right of the people to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their safety and happiness. Prudence, indeed, will dictate that governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shown that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such government, and to provide new guards for their future security.



Arnold’s April Fool’s Day for taxpayers

April 1st, 2009

I always opposed Arnold’s political career, beginning with his pet initiative in 2002, Prop. 49,  that goosed spending $500 million. He claimed that, for every $1 spent on the new programs, $3 would be saved for taxpayers.

Ever hear of a government program that worked that way? If that’s the way things worked, Obama’s $2 trillion “bailout” ripoff would be “saving” us $6 trillion — leading to the total elimination of taxes. Government “spending” that “saves” tax money is the ultimate perpetual motion machine.

In 2003, Arnold promised to oppose all new taxes, and was elected governor. In 2006, voters put him back in office. I opposed him every time, knowing he was just an Austrian socialist who married into American royalty, the socialist Kennedy family.

April Fool!

Now here we are, April Fool’s Day 2009, and his $12.5 billion in massive tax increases is kicking in. The average family will pay a couple thousand dollars more in taxes every year — unless they leave the state. I expect a large number will, further reducing the tax base — and leading to yet more tax increases. Our sales and income taxes, already the highest in Amerika, now are even higher.

To paraphrase Joni Mitchell, Arnold tore down paradise and put up a massive tax state.

And for what? Arnold says the “people” demanded that taxes be increased. He’s right:

  • The people in the powerful teachers’ unions.
  • The people in the powerful prison guards’ unions.
  • The people in the powerful government-workers’ unions.
  • The people in the Kennedy family.
  • The people in the editorial, columnist, and editorialist chairs at the ultra-leftist Los Angeles Times.
  • The people in the Marxist universities.
  • The people in the state Legislature.

He and his fat-cat buddies will be living it up, drinking champagne and chugging caviar on their yachts, while the rest of us slave away for them to pay for everything.

All we have to look forward under Arnoldocracy is blood, sweat, toil, tears, and taxes.

America after 8 years of Bush tyranny

March 30th, 2009

The following cartoon says all that needs to be said — or drawn — about the state of once-free America after 8 years of Bush tyranny:

Oh, and for all you Obama lovers out there, he’s not making things any better.

To cries of “freedom,” America in the past decade has descended into a dark cave of tyranny from which it will be difficult to leave. The government, ever incompletent, failed to protect us on 9/11, and then urned Americans’ fears into an excuse to strap a police state on us.

Bush, Cheney, the Neocons, and the others will go down in history as those who enslaved what once was the freest country ever.

Republicans continue to push tyranny

March 23rd, 2009

Achtung!

Wiped out in two general elections, Republicans still haven’t learned that Americans don’t want your stinking tyranny!

Yet there they go again. 18 Republicans in Congress, including 3 from California, are pushing to pass a new bill that would extend Soviet tyrannies they passed when they were the majority in Congress.

It’s H.R. 1467, the “Safe and Secure America Act of 2009.” A better name: The SS Amerika Akt, or Runic "SS" Amerika Akt.

It extends parts that soon would expire from the 2003 USA PATRIOT ACT, which Congress passed in a panic after the 9/11 attack, and which would be better termed the USSR TRAITORS’ Act. It repealed our sacred liberties and turned American into a tyranny.

Three of the co-sponsors are from Kalifornia:  Reps. Dan Lungren, Duncan Hunter, and Elton Gallegly.

Hunter ran a risible campaign for president last year.

Lungren is notorious as an enemy of American liberties. In the early 1980s he authored the Lungren Law, which allows the government to seize your property for any reason — even if you’re innocent — without a trial. A senile Ronald Reagan signed it. It’s a total violation of the Fourth Amendment guarantee against “unreasonable searches and seizures.” He’s still at it, getting Congress to pass a new seizure law. Herr Lungren belongs in the Reichstag in 1939, not the U.S. Congress in 2009.

So long as Republicans keep proposing, and imposing, the Runic "SS" Amerika Act and similar tyrannies, they should lose every election — and deserve to.